You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘Environment’ tag.
A lot of science is about trying to find the best questions. Because the best questions can lead us to better answers. So, in the spirit of better questions here goes.
By loosening environmental regulations aimed at pollution prevention or remediation, the mandarins reporting to POTUS 45 have apparently
made the calculation decided that some resulting uptick in pollution is justified by the jobs created thereby.
Question 1: For any given relaxation in regulations that result in an adverse biological, chemical or physical insult to the environment, what is the limit of tolerable adverse effect?
Question 2: How will the upper limit of acceptable environmental insult be determined?
Question 3: Will the upper limit of acceptable environmental insult be determined before or after the beginning of the adverse effect?
For a given situation there should be some ratio of jobs to acceptable environmental damage.
Example: By relaxing the rules on the release of coal mining waste into a river, X jobs are created and, as a result, Y households are denied potable drinking water. What is an acceptable ratio of X to Y?
Those are enough questions for now. Talk amongst yourselves.